<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AdWords Quality Score now uses Geographic Signals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bgtheory.com/blog/adwords-quality-score-now-uses-geographic-signals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bgtheory.com/blog/adwords-quality-score-now-uses-geographic-signals/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=adwords-quality-score-now-uses-geographic-signals</link>
	<description>Providing Google AdWords, PPC, SEO, and Internet Marketing Training for Your Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 06:31:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: richard</title>
		<link>http://www.bgtheory.com/blog/adwords-quality-score-now-uses-geographic-signals/comment-page-1/#comment-152085</link>
		<dc:creator>richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 03:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgtheory.com/?p=1244#comment-152085</guid>
		<description>my last comment had a tiny mistake

position preferances position 1 (applies on google MAPS)
i bid low enough for my local ads not to show on google.com
but high enough to show on google maps

position 2 on google maps is below the fold (unfortunately)
and in my experirence similar in value to being on the second page of google.com

to go through all this trouble without writing targeted ads to each city (in my case) would be a waist

at the end of this process i will combine and or eliminate some of the less significant cities (probably ending with about 10-15 campaigns)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my last comment had a tiny mistake</p>
<p>position preferances position 1 (applies on google MAPS)<br />
i bid low enough for my local ads not to show on google.com<br />
but high enough to show on google maps</p>
<p>position 2 on google maps is below the fold (unfortunately)<br />
and in my experirence similar in value to being on the second page of google.com</p>
<p>to go through all this trouble without writing targeted ads to each city (in my case) would be a waist</p>
<p>at the end of this process i will combine and or eliminate some of the less significant cities (probably ending with about 10-15 campaigns)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard</title>
		<link>http://www.bgtheory.com/blog/adwords-quality-score-now-uses-geographic-signals/comment-page-1/#comment-152082</link>
		<dc:creator>richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 06:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgtheory.com/?p=1244#comment-152082</guid>
		<description>i have 1 account i am in the process of splitting into 37 campaigns

18 differant cities + a 15 mile radius (address in ads)
google search only
text ads only
+
18 differant cities
google search + search partners (so local buisiness ads show properly)
local ads only
position preferances position 1 (applies on google)

strange thing is ive been planning this for more then a week
started oct 1
quess my qs is going up

thanks for the heads up</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have 1 account i am in the process of splitting into 37 campaigns</p>
<p>18 differant cities + a 15 mile radius (address in ads)<br />
google search only<br />
text ads only<br />
+<br />
18 differant cities<br />
google search + search partners (so local buisiness ads show properly)<br />
local ads only<br />
position preferances position 1 (applies on google)</p>
<p>strange thing is ive been planning this for more then a week<br />
started oct 1<br />
quess my qs is going up</p>
<p>thanks for the heads up</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geobased Quality Score In Google &#124; The Inside Angle</title>
		<link>http://www.bgtheory.com/blog/adwords-quality-score-now-uses-geographic-signals/comment-page-1/#comment-152075</link>
		<dc:creator>Geobased Quality Score In Google &#124; The Inside Angle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 15:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgtheory.com/?p=1244#comment-152075</guid>
		<description>[...] = &#039;http://www.theinsideangle.com/2008/10/03/geobased-quality-score-in-google/&#039;;Brad Geddes is reporting that Google has now officially added a line under Quality Score Formulas on their QS page help [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] = &#8216;http://www.theinsideangle.com/2008/10/03/geobased-quality-score-in-google/&#8217;;Brad Geddes is reporting that Google has now officially added a line under Quality Score Formulas on their QS page help [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google voegt geografische info toe aan Quality Score &#124; Tribal Internet Marketing - Weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.bgtheory.com/blog/adwords-quality-score-now-uses-geographic-signals/comment-page-1/#comment-152074</link>
		<dc:creator>Google voegt geografische info toe aan Quality Score &#124; Tribal Internet Marketing - Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 14:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgtheory.com/?p=1244#comment-152074</guid>
		<description>[...] Geddes meldt op zijn weblog dat Google voortaan ook geografische meeneemt bij het bepalen van de kwaliteitsscore van een [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Geddes meldt op zijn weblog dat Google voortaan ook geografische meeneemt bij het bepalen van de kwaliteitsscore van een [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
