<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nice Video on Google Product Search (Similar to Google Base)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bgtheory.com/blog/nice-video-on-google-product-search-similar-to-google-base/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bgtheory.com/blog/nice-video-on-google-product-search-similar-to-google-base/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=nice-video-on-google-product-search-similar-to-google-base</link>
	<description>Providing Google AdWords, PPC, SEO, and Internet Marketing Training for Your Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 16:21:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Geddes aka eWhisper</title>
		<link>http://www.bgtheory.com/blog/nice-video-on-google-product-search-similar-to-google-base/comment-page-1/#comment-224199</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Geddes aka eWhisper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 14:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgtheory.com/?p=2197#comment-224199</guid>
		<description>Yes, 90% at the DMA/Metro level.

Yahoo uses a &#039;super cookie&#039; and other data in determining location other than just IP address. Yahoo seems to be highly when they use their data correctly (which isn&#039;t always). 

My favorite change at Yahoo is that they are finally being more aggressive showing GEO ads/natural results for semi-ambiguous terms (a while ago, you would not see local results for a query such as &#039;chicago dentist&#039;; and today you will see those results).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, 90% at the DMA/Metro level.</p>
<p>Yahoo uses a &#8216;super cookie&#8217; and other data in determining location other than just IP address. Yahoo seems to be highly when they use their data correctly (which isn&#8217;t always). </p>
<p>My favorite change at Yahoo is that they are finally being more aggressive showing GEO ads/natural results for semi-ambiguous terms (a while ago, you would not see local results for a query such as &#8216;chicago dentist&#8217;; and today you will see those results).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Lacheta</title>
		<link>http://www.bgtheory.com/blog/nice-video-on-google-product-search-similar-to-google-base/comment-page-1/#comment-223501</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Lacheta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bgtheory.com/?p=2197#comment-223501</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt; &quot;Unofficially, I hear the Yahoo elves whisper they are 90% accurate at a city level, and I hear the Google one’s whisper around 85% at that level.&quot;

I&#039;m assuming you mean the metro version of a city not individual cities.

That&#039;s much better than the 80% accurate at the DMA number that was floating around a few years back.  It looks like they are making improvements in IP.  

Brad, do you buy into the 90% accuracy at the city level?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt; &#8220;Unofficially, I hear the Yahoo elves whisper they are 90% accurate at a city level, and I hear the Google one’s whisper around 85% at that level.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m assuming you mean the metro version of a city not individual cities.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s much better than the 80% accurate at the DMA number that was floating around a few years back.  It looks like they are making improvements in IP.  </p>
<p>Brad, do you buy into the 90% accuracy at the city level?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
